Keaton Hance vs Christopher Li Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 07 Nov at 06:29 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
K. Hance vs C. Li

USA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

PER
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Hance 1 - 0 Li
They have played 2 sets in total, with Keaton Hance winning 2 and Christopher Li winning 0. The last match between Keaton Hance and Christopher Li was at the M15 Orlando, 07-11-2025, Round: QF, Surface: Clay, with Keaton Hance getting the victory 6-4 6-1.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Hance | 1 |
| Li | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(QF) M15 Orlando(11-07-25)
K. Hance vs C. Li H2H Profile
K. Hance vs C. Li Match Preview:
- In recent form, Keaton Hance has been more successful on their second serve, winning 50.98% of points, compared to Christopher Li's 44.44%. This could offer Hance a slight edge in the match.
- On return games, Christopher Li has shown strong performance, winning 47.49% of opponent's second serve points, while Hance has taken 33.75% of these points.
- When returning the first serve, Keaton Hance has a slight upper hand with 30.59% as opposed to Christopher Li’s 28.47%.
- Under pressure, Christopher Li demonstrates resilience, saving 56.76% of breakpoints, higher than Keaton Hance’s 46.15%.
- Over the past year in matches, Christopher Li has a higher win rate of 61.11% compared to Keaton Hance’s 55.56%.
- Keaton Hance shines on clay courts with a 63% win record, while Christopher Li excels on indoor hard courts, also with a 63% win rate.
- Both players mainly compete at the Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K level, where Christopher Li has a superior win rate of 68.75% compared to Hance's 55.56%.
- Opponents faced by Hance had an average ranking of 476, slightly lower than Li's opponents with an average of 455.5, hinting at tougher opponents for Li.
- If the match reaches a deciding set, Keaton Hance has been unbeatable, winning all deciding sets over the last 12 months, whereas Christopher Li has won 67% of such situations.
Editorial Prediction (November 7, 2025, UTC):
Based on recent statistics and performance trends, both players exhibit specific strengths that could influence the match outcome. Keaton Hance shows stronger second serve performance, which could be a critical factor during prolonged rallies and serve games. However, Christopher Li's impressive return game and higher breakpoint save percentage may trouble Hance, especially during high-pressure moments.
Christopher Li's overall higher win percentage and better performance against slightly tougher opponents might give him a more rounded edge in competitive scenarios. While Hance has an immaculate record in deciding sets, Li's adaptability on diverse surfaces and consistency in Futures/Satellites/ITF level competitions can be decisive.
Considering all factors, if the match is tightly contested, Keaton Hance's resilience in deciding sets could tip the balance in his favor. Nevertheless, Christopher Li seems the more likely winner due to his overall recent form, effectiveness under pressure, and ability to perform well against higher-ranked players.
Keaton Hance vs Christopher Li Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
K. Hance vs C. Li H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 0 |
| 1:27:5 | Average Match Time | 1:27:5 |
| 67% (33/49) | 1st Serve % | 67% (26/39) |
| 55% (18/33) | 1st Serve Win % | 42% (11/26) |
| 50% (8/16) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (5/13) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 38% (3/8) |
| 59% (23/39) | Return Points Win % | 47% (23/49) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
K. Hance Recent Matches Played
C. Li Recent Matches Played

K. Hance vs C. Li Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 50.00% (6/6) | YTD Win/Loss | 43.75% (14/18) |
| 46.15% (12/14) | Sets Win/Loss | 46.67% (35/40) |
| 47.95% (105/114) | Games Win/Loss | 50.99% (336/323) |
| 0.00% (0/2) | Hard Win/Loss | 33.33% (2/4) |
| 60.00% (6/4) | Clay Win/Loss | 40.91% (9/13) |
| 0% (0/0) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.00% (3/1) |
| 0.09 | Aces Per Game | 0.15 |
| 10 | Aces Total | 47 |
| 0.21 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.31 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 98 |
| 1:26:49 | Average Match Time | 1:31:1 |
| 356.83 | Average Opponent Rank | 510.03 |
| 66% (417/628) | 1st Serve % | 62% (1089/1751) |
| 61% (256/417) | 1st Serve Win % | 61% (667/1089) |
| 55% (115/211) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (303/662) |
| 48% (30/63) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 43% (90/209) |
| 41% (246/599) | Return Points Win % | 42% (735/1740) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 0.00% (0/4) |
| 50.00% (6/6) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (14/14) |
| 50% (6/12) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 44% (14/32) |
| 0% (0/1) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 0% (0/4) |
| 100% (2/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 36% (4/11) |
| 100% (5/5) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 67% (18/12) |
| 0% (5/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 33% (18/6) |
| 14% (7/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 14% (14/2) |